|
Alan Chartock - Blog ![]() Alan Chartock shares his thoughts for today....
Wednesday, September 07, 2005
Media was wrong to publish Pataki's private conversations Just because the courts say that newspapers can publish what may be illegally gained material doesn’t mean doing so is necessarily ethical. Put yourself in the picture. Let’s just say that someone sets up an illegal wiretap on your telephone. The recording device finds you sharing your innermost fears and secrets with a trusted intimate friend, advisor or mental health professional. Let’s just say that in the heat of the moment, you use some language you would never use in polite society. Let’s just say that you disclose business information you wouldn’t want others to know, or you display a side of yourself you wouldn’t want to share with the general public. Let’s just say you are talking about a hot date. Is there any one of us who hasn’t said something in the privacy of our home or on the phone or in an e-mail that we would rather not share with the rest of the world? How would you feel if that material later showed up on the front page of a New York tabloid? Now, following along, what if the despicable human being who was eavesdropping on your conversation took the tapes and dropped them at the doorstep of the lesser of the daily tabloids? What if the tabloid took the position that they didn’t know the tapes were illegally recorded? Hey, the public has the right to know and they have the right to share the material - your most intimate secrets - with the public. Remember this is YOU we are talking about, not some movie star or politician. Whether you’re an accountant or a bus driver or a nurse, the newspaper, interested in publishing your prurient thoughts, would find some post hoc ergo propter hoc reason for publishing your secrets. They know their readers eat that stuff up and trust me on this, they will always find a self-serving reason for dishing it up. If you can understand that, we can now move on to George Pataki. Recently some tapes came to light and their contents were published in a New York tabloid, the New York Post. They showed that George Pataki’s wife, like the rest of us, can occasionally use an explicative to punctuate her unhappiness; that she might harbor some jealousies towards other politicians’ wives; and that she really doesn’t like to work that hard. (I’m shocked, I tell you, shocked!) The tapes also gave a pretty good inside view of the way in which the Governor’s chief patronage dispenser did his job when he worked for the governor. He no longer holds that job - he is now a politically-connected lobbyist and he’s really cleaning up, in large part due to his relationship with the Patakiites. Clearly, the public never knew that when the Republicans win, they fill jobs with their people and when the Democrats win, the same thing happens. Now let’s move to the matter of stolen property. I know a store that I think may receive stolen goods. It has been known to post signs saying, “We buy used cell phones and lap top computers.” There are some cynics who think that means they are encouraging those who have stolen things to come in and turn them over for cash. Receiving stolen property is against the law. If they catch you, they can arrest you and put you in jail. It is a no-no, but apparently not for newspapers. You will remember the Pentagon Papers. Daniel Ellsworth stole the papers and leaked them to some of the country’s greatest newspapers. They were published in the public interest and ever since, newspapers have had the right to publish your secrets. They will say that they didn’t know the material was stolen but even if they knew it, it’s okay because they didn’t do the stealing. In the case of the Pentagon Papers, the country was taught a valuable lesson about how public policy is made. In the case of the Pataki tapes, someone will make the same claim. But what about where we began? What about when it happens to you? I asked a man I much respect, Speaker Sheldon Silver, about it and he shrugged it off saying that the Supreme Court had already decided the issue. Just remember that the next time it happens to you or someone you love and you ask, “Can they do that?” that the answer is, “Yes.” Of course, some day it might happen to Rupert Murdoch, the guy who owns the Post. Maybe a family fight with his son who just quit the empire or some explicative-laden conversation with an employee will end up in the Daily News. I wonder what he’ll say then? For his part, George Pataki is fit to be tied. I’m no fan of the guy but I’ve got to tell you, I think he’s right on this one. He says he turned his complaint over to the FBI. My bet is that it goes nowhere. Alan Chartock shares his thoughts for today....
Summer's almost gone I, Publius By Alan Chartock
|
![]() Alan Chartock Bio Alan Chartock Inteviews Berkshire Ramblers WAMC Home Archives 01/06/2004 01/07/2004 01/08/2004 01/09/2004 01/11/2004 01/12/2004 01/13/2004 01/14/2004 01/15/2004 01/16/2004 01/19/2004 01/20/2004 01/22/2004 01/25/2004 01/27/2004 02/01/2004 02/04/2004 02/07/2004 02/09/2004 02/14/2004 02/15/2004 02/19/2004 02/21/2004 02/26/2004 02/27/2004 03/04/2004 03/06/2004 03/14/2004 03/17/2004 03/20/2004 03/24/2004 03/27/2004 03/30/2004 04/03/2004 04/10/2004 04/15/2004 04/21/2004 04/24/2004 05/02/2004 05/06/2004 05/08/2004 05/16/2004 05/19/2004 05/24/2004 05/27/2004 05/29/2004 06/06/2004 06/07/2004 06/13/2004 06/29/2004 07/11/2004 08/16/2004 08/18/2004 08/25/2004 09/30/2004 10/29/2004 11/09/2004 11/13/2004 01/13/2005 01/24/2005 02/10/2005 02/14/2005 02/22/2005 02/28/2005 03/07/2005 03/28/2005 04/04/2005 04/11/2005 04/18/2005 04/26/2005 05/02/2005 05/10/2005 05/16/2005 05/23/2005 05/31/2005 06/06/2005 06/13/2005 06/20/2005 06/27/2005 07/05/2005 07/11/2005 07/18/2005 07/25/2005 08/01/2005 08/08/2005 08/15/2005 08/22/2005 08/29/2005 09/07/2005 09/12/2005 09/20/2005 09/26/2005 10/03/2005 10/10/2005 10/17/2005 10/18/2005 10/24/2005 10/31/2005 11/08/2005 11/14/2005 11/21/2005 11/28/2005 12/05/2005 12/12/2005 12/19/2005 12/22/2005 01/03/2006 01/09/2006 01/16/2006 01/23/2006 01/30/2006 02/06/2006 02/13/2006 02/21/2006 02/27/2006 03/06/2006 03/13/2006 03/20/2006 03/27/2006 04/03/2006 04/10/2006 04/17/2006 04/25/2006 05/01/2006 05/08/2006 05/15/2006 05/22/2006 05/30/2006 06/05/2006 06/12/2006 06/19/2006 06/26/2006 07/05/2006 07/10/2006 07/17/2006 07/24/2006 07/31/2006 08/07/2006 08/14/2006 08/21/2006 08/28/2006 09/05/2006 09/11/2006 09/18/2006 09/25/2006 10/02/2006 10/10/2006 10/16/2006 10/23/2006 10/30/2006 11/06/2006 11/14/2006 11/20/2006 11/27/2006 12/04/2006 12/11/2006 12/18/2006 12/26/2006 01/02/2007 01/08/2007 01/15/2007 01/22/2007 01/29/2007 02/06/2007 02/12/2007 02/20/2007 02/26/2007 03/05/2007 03/12/2007 03/19/2007 03/26/2007 04/02/2007 04/09/2007 04/16/2007 04/23/2007 05/02/2007 05/07/2007 05/08/2007 05/14/2007 07/09/2007 07/16/2007 07/23/2007 07/30/2007 08/06/2007 08/13/2007 08/20/2007 08/27/2007 09/04/2007 09/10/2007 09/17/2007 09/24/2007 10/01/2007 10/09/2007 10/15/2007 10/22/2007 11/05/2007 11/06/2007 11/12/2007 11/19/2007 11/26/2007 12/03/2007 12/10/2007 |